/lit/ - Literature

>>11803702
>>11803724
>>11803798
>Please, someone, anyone—is this really indefensible “/pol/tard” psychopathy?
No it is not.
>What is so terribly unreasonable about holding this position?
Nothing about that is terrible and don't ever let anyone brainwash you into thinking that the wish to preserve what is yours and what you love is evil. You are just a normal guy who wants to preserve his culture, identity and way of life.

The problem is that technological progress (espescially the material forces of the industrial revolution) has set humanity on an irreversible and accelerating course which will destroy all particularity (different geno- and phenotypes, languages, cultures, belief systems) of humanity and probably even current the environment and wildlife of the planet itself.
Both Capitalism (which is a product of this technological progress) and "the idea of Communism" (which is a critique of capitalism and also its inevitable successor according to marxist dogma) are forces of internationalism.
Thus "wanting to preserve culture, phenotype, language and identity by REJECTING OR EVEN FIGHTING AGAINST INTERNATIONALISM" is a cardinal sin in the eyes of both capitalists (muh open borders, muh free trade, muh profit) and communists (muh classless, borderless and stateless world).
In their eyes you reject the inevitable course of history (capitalists: whig history, communists: global communist society as the final stage of the dialectical-historical develeopment of humanity) See >>11803886

Oswald Mosley was right when he said: *Everything's against us. Governments, money, press, television - all the new forces are used against us." All the great forces, all the material powers of the world, you say, are against you.*
And unlike him I don't see a way to reverse or stop this process. That's the blackpill I present you.