/lit/ - Literature

>>21427623
You're just feeling what men are supposed to feel, OP, and psychologically healthy women feel the same thing for the same reason.

>Then the man said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

It's sad to see just how many desiccated husks there are in here, for men to lose pure wonder and amazement at the beauty of Woman - a very important and noble part of them has died. They are lesser for it, so long as it remains lost.

>>21301543
Women tend to deal with subjects differently than men, and to gravitate to subjects different than men. Unsurprisingly, an intrinsically feminine perspective on a given subject resonates more with women than with men.

It also has to do with the current tone and subject material of most modern female authors. It is generally preachy, jaded, and propagandically manufactured to infuse some sense of moral superiority (in the sympathetic audience) or guilt (in the target audience - which is typically straight men). This is obviously alienating, in the sense that no man who isn't a masochistic subservient is likely to read more than one or two of those works - even if he is exceptionally open minded. Therefore, the majority of current female authors would likely be pushed aside.

For my part, despite enjoying the writing of some women, I am far more skeptical when looking into a work by a modern woman than that of a man - in the sense of whether to expect some sort of gender justice fueled agenda - and therefore, whether to avoid the work altogether.