/lit/ - Literature

Don't philosophers do it all the time? They label themselves 'utilitarian' or 'deontologist' but their behaviour is indistinguishable from the average person.

I read a book about ethics and have become convinced of certain arguments, but I am also convinced of my intuitions, for example

>A: there is no objective morality
>B: it is wrong to exploit others

How do you deal with reason and sense conflicting?

Is there a point to doing philosophy if you're going to ignore the answers and claim that intuition must take precedence?