/lit/ - Literature

>>15095620
>denies a Rishi
>reading commentaries of Rig Veda Rishis
>never experiencing enlightenment yourself
>reinterprets Rig Veda from the commentaries of commentaries that Shankara never written
>believes that you need to follow the ways of a poo in a temple to be saved, ignoring Shankara's sown teachings
>believes in samsara but not soul transmigration from body to body is itself the part of karmic cycle nor the principle behind the mortal soul can ever recollect past lives yet believes that Rishis are telling the truth in the Vedas that their Ishvaras remember being other than their current state at face value via sola scriptura argument yet provides no valid argument against the source text in the five nikayas disregarding the abidhamma commentaries that speaks against the sorce text
>thinks commentaries are wrong in Buddhism yet never questions if the commentaries of the Vedas are wrong in the Upanishads
>still thinks sanskrit came before prakrit when prakrit using artifacts came before sanskrit
>didn't know the Mauryan Brahmin caste used prakrit
>taking poetic language literally and metaphysical language physically in the nikayas while probably using the corrupted translations that never properly translate important key words
>thinking Gotama Buddha was wrong despite how Shankara adopted the same core teachings and expanded upon them from the Mahasamghika early school that made Buddhist hybrid sanskrit that transferred many key words that Shankara uses came from presectarian Buddhism which had transferred the truth into sanskrit
>denies everything here yet has never read from a non biased buddhologist
>can't cope with the reality that karma and reincarnation came to Northern India by the Scythians which includes the earliest upanishads but none of the upanishads are written in prakrit meaning there is no objective proof of those two upanishads existing prior to 500BCE but merely semi independently from Buddhism
>can't come to terms with how both Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta is inferior to Neoplatonism on the nature of the two principles without claiming ignorance to ignorance
>gets btfo by a fat bald tattooed scandinavian german american
>still thinks real Buddhism is about morals and nihilism
>judges a book by their stupid fans and tries to claim your favorite fanclub isn't full of stupid people that can't take criticism
>sucks the dick of Sufis and never denouncing Schuon's cult

>>14456019
We vow fidelity to the banner of the Vassal States of England and to the Monarchy for which it upholds many nations beneath Albion indestructible with victory and impudence for all.