/lit/ - Literature

>>21207376
>virtuous

>How come no photos of him?
Retard.
P.S.
Why did you delete all the videos on your YouTube channel, Card? I was looking forwards to your content creator career?

>Do I write out of love to men? No, I write because I want to procure for my thoughts an existence in the world; and, even if I foresaw that these thoughts would deprive you of your rest and your peace, even if I saw the bloodiest wars and the fall of many generations springing up from this seed of thought – I would nevertheless scatter it. Do with it what you will and can, that is your affair and does not trouble me.

also why do people insist on using the meme drawing when we have not one, but two pictures of Stirner?

Tell me about Stirner.

any good right wing philosophers? lefties always have smart ppl to validate their beliefs, the right wing needs some too. all ik so far is max stirner. who are some other ones?

I could've killed Stirner with my bare hands.

do you think aliens would subscribe to the labor theory of value?
also more books like stirner pl0x

>>17787822
I am Max Stirner reincarnated. I tried to read my old works but could not but that does not matter, what proves it is I rebuilt my philosophy form the ground up in a basic form with no knowledge of my previous life.

Nah Stirner is a spook

At first sight, Nazi totalitarianism may seem the opposite of Stirner's radical individualism. But fascism was above all an attempt to dissolve the social ties created by history and replace them by artificial bonds among individuals who were expected to render explicit obedience to the state on grounds of absolute egoism. Fascist education combined the tenets of asocial egoism and unquestioning conformism, the latter being the means by which the individual secured his own niche in the system. Stirner's philosophy has nothing to say against conformism, it only objects to the Ego being subordinated to any higher principle: the egoist is free to adjust to the world if it is clear he will better himself by doing so. His 'rebellion' may take the form of utter servility if it will further his interest; what he must not do is to be bound by 'general' values or myths of humanity. The totalitarian ideal of a barrack-like society from which all real, historical ties have been eliminated is perfectly consistent with Stirner's principles: the egoist, by his very nature, must be prepared to fight under any flag that suits his convenience.I

The National Socialists were the OG union of egoists

Now that the dust has settled, to who did this face belong? Becket or Stirner?