/lit/ - Literature

>parliaments are dominated by secular, communist, atheist, blasphemous, indecent, sinful, and disbelieving people who announce their hostility toward the Dīn, and do not hide their disavowal of the Sharʿīah of Islām.

>The perpetrators of the one of the greatest sins, those who commit the sin of the people of Lūṭ [Lot, i.e. the people of Soddom and Gomorrah], want a law that serves them, their brothers and their likes. The insolent adulterers suggest regimes that preserve their immorality and insolent debauchery. The usurers offer legislations that multiply their fortunes and protect their practices.
https://peopleoftawhid.org/democracy-the-modern-idol/

Democracy: The Modern Idol

>The perpetrators of the one of the greatest sins, those who commit the sin of the people of Lūṭ [Lot, i.e. the people of Soddom and Gomorrah], want a law that serves them, their brothers and their likes. The insolent adulterers suggest regimes that preserve their immorality and insolent debauchery. The usurers offer legislations that multiply their fortunes and protect their practices.
https://peopleoftawhid.org/democracy-the-modern-idol/

Thoughts? By a deceased member of al-Qaeda, translated and republished by ISIS

>So, what is this Democracy that the politicians of the West want to impose on us and the secularists are propagating for?

>the religion of Democracy is such a system that makes the people a sole ruler and a master with no power above them. Its authority rules, its judgment applies, its will is implemented, its regulations are enforced, its laws are respected, and its sovereignty is the supreme. According to the Democratic system, the judgment of the people is not to be argued and the justice system is not to be overruled. The people in this system are not questioned about what they do.

>parliaments are dominated by secular, communist, atheist, blasphemous, indecent, sinful, and disbelieving people who announce their hostility toward the Dīn, and do not hide their disavowal of the Sharʿīah of Islām.

>Those parliamentarians do not need a legitimate form in what they allow or forbid - that may contradict with the Sharʿīah and its rulings - to throw in the eyes of the naive people. They do not care about the Sharʿīah nor do they value it. Instead, they legislate, they suggest and they propose according to their opinion and according to their caprices, which they call interests. Therefore, they allowed usury in the name of economic interest. They allowed adultery in the name of personal freedom. They allowed alcohol and bars under the slogan of tourism and entertainment. We know, for instance, that alcohol is absolutely forbidden in Islām. Should an idiot parliamentarian wish to suggest the lifting of the prohibition on selling alcohol in order to improve a collapsing economy of the country for one or two years or even for ever, or in order to entertain the tourists, then he will not be blamed and all he needs is to obtain the approval of the majority for this important economic project. Once the parliament majority approves it, selling and trading with spirits become legal and no one will have the right to prevent it. Whoever contradicts the parliamentary legislation subjects himself to pursuit and punishment.

Cont