/lit/ - Literature

>>23089338
>Most women have jobs,
pic rel, however you do get a point for not immediately reaching for your "i bet you don't even get sex" omni-tool dispute-resolver. based on this alone i bet you are more tolerable than most women and have a kernel of interiority

>>23044858
force multipliers* typo

Bonus pic. Remember, we're talking about "fine-tuning" a society where the only real net producers and maintainers of infrastructure (white male working class) are effectively serfs and the national pastime is shitting on them and telling them to die. Everybody else is a, statistically speaking, a parasite and non-producer, and this graph doesn't even take into account that much of how modern "wealth" is calculated is meaningless GDP padding in an elaborate corporate welfare system. Women contribute FAR less to actual production than this indicates.

The last 50 years have been one giant, increasingly manic saturnalia, in which the people who made such a thing possible are expected to keep it going as long as possible while being ground beneath the feet of the revelers.

reminder what you're trying to have a productive conversation with: a net drain that requires the charity of others just to function at below average levels

>>22950720
>I think women nowadays are the demography that supports most of the shittiest business done by men
women are the entire reason civilization is unsustainable currently:
>notoriously unworldly, don't care about history/geography/politics/philosophy at all
>notoriously naive / goofy, weird combination of child emotions/instincts and adult responsibilities
>notoriously sensuous, you can distract them with shiny objects (as you said)
>can't even drive
>25-50% competence level of men even after going into net economic drain just to train them (see any military or business with women)
>require bloated "HR" to manage their work drama
>require entire therapy/pharma industries to manage their life drama
>still end up as childless neurotic alcoholics anyway
>without strong cultural forces mandating it, they WILL NOT get married or have kids, thus leading to isolation/dementia/insanity in old age, burdening the welfare state and just their families and society in general with their bullshit
>they are a net economic drain and net non-producers (pic related)
>notorious consumers, will spend all disposable income on anything shiny or tasty
>notorious non-savers (still expect men to come in and pay)
>notoriously naive about how government functions - assume the welfare state is the "default" (part of their goofiness/lack of knowledge of history and politics)
>notoriously insecure, chip on shoulder syndrome, know they're mentally/physically inferior and thus want to "throw their weight around" (hint: exactly like a teenager between childhood and adulthood - except teenage males grow out of it)
>ditzy/gullible (dilutes democracy by making it more profitable to target them with propaganda than to convince men of reasonable positions - see edward bernays)
>very very susceptible to being pandered to / ass kissed (see above)
>now remember they're 55%+ of the voting population
Women took semi-functional male suffrage states, with political/cultural signal-to-noise ratios of 1:1 and sometimes as good as 2:1 or 4:1 in eras of high cultural/educational excellence, and instantly made the signal-to-noise ratio 1:10 overnight. And it compounds, so now it's like 1:1000.

See pic related. Society is ultimately made up of producers and consumers. If your producers are not rewarded for bearing most of the burden of production, they will be crushed or rebel. If your consumers are told that they are producers just by virtue of lazing about and "having fun," they will aggravate the situation to a breaking point by grinding the producers into dust.

>>22943043
Numbers must always be interpreted and can't speak for themselves but some are mighty useful for pointing to interesting facts

>>22932284
>alcoholic white trash communities aren't nearly this bad tho
Whites have a genetic advantage. West Virginia's avg IQ is 4-5 points higher than Mississippi, simply because Mississippi has a 37% black population. 37% is enough to drag it down under West Virginia of all places. No matter what modifier you want to apply, a _____ white or Asian will generally outperform a _____ black or native.

My personal theory is that native African IQs may have been or may be as high as European or Asian IQs, at had the potential to be, but African-Americans are deeply dysgenic from centuries of inbreeding and negative selection pressures.

>Old
>Dead
Statistically, actually contributed to society rather than being a net drain on it
>White
Statistically, actually contributes to society rather than being a net drain on it
>Guy
Statistically, actually contributes to society rather than being a net drain on it