[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17090010 [View]
File: 88 KB, 1200x1200, sir-francis-galton-9305647-1-402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17090010

>Passions of Love -- The argument has been repeated that love is too strong a passion to be restrained by such means as would be tolerated at the present time. I regret that I did not express the distinction that ought to have been made between its two stages, that of slight inclination and that of falling thoroughly into love, for it is the first of these rather than the second that I hope the popular feeling of the future will successfully resist. Every match-making mother appreciates the difference. If a girl is taught to look upon a class of men as tabooed, whether owing to rank, creed, connections or other causes, she does not regard them as possible husbands and turns her thoughts elsewhere. The proverbial "Mrs. Grundy" has enormous influence in checking the marriages she considers indiscreet.

Based A*nglo bugman

>> No.17044639 [View]
File: 88 KB, 1200x1200, 03A58512-62D6-4D47-B5C6-B9763071D637.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17044639

Good thread
In line with Spencer, I would offer up a particularly soulless man by the name of Francis Galton, who is in many respects responsible for the practice of eugenics, an idea which came to fester, fashionably, across all of the American universities and was promulgated by all of the good little Anglo lib progressive professors until thousands and thousands of people were sterilized and killed

>> No.15661673 [View]
File: 88 KB, 1200x1200, eugenics man francis galton.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15661673

How does one philosophically debunk eugenics?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]