[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14474443 [View]
File: 175 KB, 411x546, 1577587363939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14474443

What is the underlying darkness of this sensitive and compassionate man's philosophy that he was too vague to clarify? Who is the Dark Whitehead?

>> No.14448326 [View]
File: 175 KB, 411x546, darkwhitehead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14448326

>>14448293
Dread it, run from it, becoming arrives all the same

>> No.14434658 [View]
File: 175 KB, 411x546, darkwhitehead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14434658

What is Whitehead's Anti-God, the opposition to his God-as-process? Did he avoid speculation about an anti-God to avoid making scandalous but necessary accusations that would trigger defense mechanisms by other beliefs? Did he camoflage his philosophy in part to avoid being flattened by Christianity as a potential threat to it?

Can Deleuze-Guattarian thought help to illuminate this "dark" aspect of Whiteheadean thought that this sensitive, compassionate man was too kind to try to clarify beyond politely vague generalities?

In a different sense, is there is a sexual element of Whiteheadean thought that was too obscene and humanly fleshy for his polite sentiments, such that he left it shrouded in ambiguity? Perhaps not daring to fully reveal his notion of God in fully hyper-pagan organic nudity for fear of offending Christianity's prudish sentiments and similarly drawing its scorn?

>> No.14434638 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 175 KB, 411x546, darkwhitehead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14434638

What is Whitehead's Anti-God, an opposition to his God as process? Did he avoid speculation against the Anti-God as expressed in particular human-relevant processes to avoid making scandalous accusations that would trigger defense mechanisms by other beliefs?

Can Deleuze-Guattarian thought help to illuminate this "dark" aspect of Whiteheadean thought that this sensitive, compassionate man was too kind to try to clarify beyond politely vague generalities?

In a different sense, is there is a sexual element of Whiteheadean thought that is too obscene and humanly fleshy that he similarly left it shrouded in ambiguity? Perhaps not daring to fully reveal his notion of God in fully organic nudity, and so giving it such a label?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]