/lit/ - Literature

>>19349623
Worship the Mazdan conception of God, Ahura Mazda.

Mazdan conception of God:

1) There is a happy hamster in a cage.
2) This happy hamster is raised well by one individual. This individual introduces order and peace to the hamster's life. We refer to this individual as "good".
3) Some guy breaks in and harms said hamster. We refer to him as "evil". He brings disorder and pain to the hamster's life.
4) The good individual resisted and fought against evil guy in order to protect his hamster, but he failed.
5) Evil guy disappears, but the good individual was not responsible for the bad guy's actions, since he did his best to fight against him.

Note: This is analogous to the worldviews of Zoroastrianism, Manichaeism, Mazdakism, and Madeanism. We can provisionally call this "ditheism".

Abrahamic conception of God:

1) There is a happy hamster in a cage.
2) This happy hamster is raised well by one supposedly "good" individual. This individual introduces order and peace to the hamster's life for a time. However, here is the main difference compared to Part I, the individual constructed the conditions for the creation and arrival of the evil guy.
3) The evil guy breaks in and harms said hamster. He bring disorder and pain to the hamster's life. Keep in mind, he was created by the supposedly "good" guy.
4) The "good" individual purposely fails against evil guy, letting him have his way with the hamster. Since he created the evil guy, he must be more powerful than the evil guy, so the only way the evil guy can win is unless the "good" guy lets him.
5) Evil guy disappears, but the good individual was responsible for the bad guy's actions, since he initially created him. In fact, this can be considered as "a part of his plan".
CONCLUSION: The "good" individual is not actually good. We cannot properly call him good because i) he created the evil guy, ii) since he created the evil guy, he was more powerful than the evil guy but ultimately let him have his way with the hamster, iii) it ultimately falls into his "plan", hence the saying "everything has a plan" from Satanic Boomer monotheists.

This is the worldview of monotheists like Christians, Muslims, and Jews. They are Satanists, and it would be better off if they were all eliminated after all of West Eurasia is force converted into Zoroastrianism.

>>17579125
The original first two volumes of the Hamtaro manga/picture book has better artwork than the anime and video game iterations, imo.

>>14331250
Adopt a hamster and treat him/her with love. Realize Ahura Mazda is viewing us the same way, but he can't always win because Ahriman is strong.
I recommend meditating with the first 2 volumes of the Hamtaro manga, which have awe-inspiring art. Hamtaro: Ham-Ham Heartbreak and Rainbow Rescue are good too.

Let me give a thought-experiment. There are two parts:

Part I:

1) There is a happy hamster in a cage.
2) This happy hamster is raised well by one individual. This individual introduces order and peace to the hamster's life. We refer to this individual as "good".
3) Some guy breaks in and harms said hamster. We refer to him as "evil". He brings disorder and pain to the hamster's life.
4) The good individual resisted and fought against evil guy in order to protect his hamster, but he failed.
5) Evil guy disappears, but the good individual was not responsible for the bad guy's actions, since he did his best to fight against him.

Note: This is analogous to the worldviews of Zoroastrianism, Manichaeism, Mazdakism, and Madeanism. We can call this "ditheism". Now onto the second part.

Part II:

1) There is a happy hamster in a cage.
2) This happy hamster is raised well by one supposedly "good" individual. This individual introduces order and peace to the hamster's life for a time. However, here is the main difference compared to Part I, the individual constructed the conditions for the creation and arrival of the evil guy.
3) The evil guy breaks in and harms said hamster. He bring disorder and pain to the hamster's life. Keep in mind, he was created by the supposedly "good" guy.
4) The "good" individual purposely fails against evil guy, letting him have his way with the hamster. Since he created the evil guy, he must be more powerful than the evil guy, so the only way the evil guy can win is unless the "good" guy lets him.
5) Evil guy disappears, but the good individual was responsible for the bad guy's actions, since he initially created him. In fact, this can be considered as "a part of his plan".
CONCLUSION: The "good" individual is not actually good. We cannot properly call him good because i) he created the evil guy, ii) since he created the evil guy, he was more powerful than the evil guy but ultimately let him have his way with the hamster, iii) it ultimately falls into his "plan", hence the saying "everything has a plan" from Satanic Boomer monotheists.

This is the worldview of monotheists like Christians, Muslims, and Jews. They are Satanists, and it would be better off if they were all eliminated after Iran reconnects to the true ditheistic interpretation of Zoroastrianism.

>>13563664
It's Ham-Ham Time...
It's time to cleanse yourself of all defilement...

>>13278977
I got my BS in Neuroscience, and I think mind-body dualism is still valid. Materialism/physicalism is also unfalsifiable.