/lit/ - Literature

>>22902299
>The solution after all that is simply to take Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior?
yes

Rank his novels

>>22072982
Yeah dude, horrible and cruel events like death, addiction, and illness never happen to people. I guess we should take your advice! Therefore, all writers including Dostoevsky should be like Jane Austen and make happy little comedy of manners for rich people, and avoid shame and sadness in their characters

le sad russian guy

le sad russian guy

le sad russian guy

le sad russian guy

The most based writer of the past two hundred years. Seethe fedora atheistfags.

Just a reminder some soi atheist is spamming the Dostoevsky plebbit meme. Let's go over why he's the most based author since Cervantes.
>trained soldier
>mystic orthodox
>anti-communist
>traditionalist
Discord trannies can't handle the D-man, so they spam nonsensical force memes.

Just a reminder some soi atheist is spamming the Dostoevsky plebbit meme. Let's go over why he's the most based author since Cervantes.
>trained soldier
>mystic orthodox
>anti-communist
>traditionalist
Discord trannies can't handle the D-man, so they spam nonsensical force memes.

Just a reminder some soi atheist is spamming the Dostoevsky plebbit meme. Let's go over why he's the most based author since Cervantes.
>trained soldier
>mystic orthodox
>anti-communist
>conservative
Discord trannies can't handle the D-man, so they spam nonsensical force memes.

/lit/ approved Dostoevsky translation?

>>16581359
>can't find the overdue library book

>and the answer to all of their problems was the Russian Orthodox Church, the end.

>I am forty years old now, and you know forty years is a whole lifetime; you know it is extreme old age. To live longer than forty years is bad manners, is vulgar, immoral. Who does live beyond forty? Answer that, sincerely and honestly I will tell you who do: fools and worthless fellows.
Is he right?

Why is Dostoievsky such a mediocre, cheap, fraudulent writer? He has a really shallow and superificial writing style, and he seems to aim for a wide audience of drooling midwits, hence why we can all find High School and freshmen praising him so badly even though they do not possess a dint of knowledge of literature, not to mention the fact that all the appraisal for Dostoievski's work hides behind that ridiculous facade that his works ar ephilospohical and deep even though Dosto himself admitted that he was terribly weak on philosophy.

DOSTO DOSTO BASED DOST HAHA PLEB I BET YOU HAVENT READ NOTES FROM THE MEMEGROUND IN BASED TRANSLATION YET GOOD GOD MAN THE UNDERGROUND MAN TOTALLY ME BTW BROTHERS IDIOTOV BEST BOOKS SINCE FINNEGANS JEST LAMO REDDITORS DONT EVEN READ MY DEEP OBSCURE PHILOSOPHICAL RUSSIAN EKSISTENTIALISM LORD I WISH I WAS ORTHODOX AND TOTALLY BASED AND REDPILLED AMERICAN HERE BTW HAHA SUBSCRIBE AND DONATE TO JORDAN KERMITSTEIN

ITT

Dilettantes who use fiction as a backdrop for shitty political, religious or ideological agendas because they are too cowardly to write an essay for fear of criticism.

Which translation do you prefer for Dostoevsky?

MUH CHRISTIANITY

I can't understand Dostoevsky. I'm trying really hard to read Notes from the underground but I really can't even understand what it is I'm reading. I'll read a whole chapter from Part 1 and have everything just leave my brain as soon as it enters. Am I just stupid? Am I not supposed to be reading Dostoevsky?

Sup /lit/, I am an idiot who hasn't read a book in more than a year (I mean literature). The other day I was flirting with some roastie and she mentioned how much she liked Dostoevsky. The thing is looking at his books they are really long.

Can you point me out to a shorter/easier to read book from Dostoevsky? Or maybe a summary so I can pretend I read the book and be smart in the eyes of this girl? What to say so it sounds like I read his books?