/lit/ - Literature

For shorter stuff or things you've been thinking about for some time I believe just jumping into it is the best course. But if it's a longer work or something you want to have a certain structure or a very specific progression an outline can help you get better results and work faster.

This is good >>6420259 but you can also buy those small library cards and write there. If you have a fluid structure you can switch them around over a table or the floor and quickly see how it would go.

>>6409803
I could answer the same to you:
>Why? then it'll just die again.
If we make something new we don't have failure on your past to worry about.
Also, TAR was charactertistic because it gave monetary prices to the best writers. I don't have any kind of interest in doing so. The more zines we make the more we can pretend we're a good board, and it's fun to invent names and formats.
I say: tabloid seize, three columns. Short stories share their page with flash fiction. Illustrations allowed.

>>6401628
>>6401619
>>6401610
>>6401607
>>6401602
>>6401598
>>6401590
Hey, notes guy, I don't wanna be a bitch telling you what to do or anything but it would be really better if you just make a mediafire of all your notes. It's always the same people saving them, anyway. If you do it I would seriously lobby to add it to the sticky if we ever get a new one.

Also, this is the Shakespearean five act structure, right? It's a bit different from the Aristotelian take and quite more useful than that silliness of the hero's journey.

Try reading Raymond Carver. He leaves the door very open for you to insert interpretations, and in those interpretations that you make you can recognize the intentions hidden in the work,
http://nbu.bg/webs/amb/american/6/carver/cathedral.htm

>>6381688
que hacés picarón?

>>6377406
pics? (of the notebook, obviously)