[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20053166 [View]
File: 35 KB, 540x540, 5DDD6C83-F387-4129-95AF-BB7C62B3235A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20053166

>>20053114
> Taxonomy is prior to and more meaningful than genetics
You have done nothing to show why RACIAL taxonomies are meaningful. Until you do that, you literally have no grounds of justification. All you’ve done is demonstrated your circular reasoning over and over again. That’s why this argument has completely stalled, because you refuse to acknowledge why your tatuological reasoning doesn’t add up.

> a more accurate understanding of reality
How is it more accurate if racial taxonomies are LESS predictive of behaviours than genetic differences? It’s an obfuscation, not a clarification.

> Also, you should always second guess yourself writing something when it begins with, "so you're saying...", because that is probably not what your opponent said.
and then you move on to saying something like this:
> Because race is marred by ideological beliefs, it should be abolished - so you said.
I didn’t say it should be abolished, I simply said it is an entirely unscientific category. you’re now doing exactly the kind of paraphrasing you accused me of doing, you dirty hypocrite.

> Humanism, the idea that all humans are essentially alike
If I believe in genetic differences, then I DONT believe that humans are alike. More strawmanning. You are so predictable at this point, it’s embarrassing.

I’m done with this argument. You are disingenuous, narcissistic and are incapable of acknowledging your circular reasoning, your unscientific grounds for (allegedly) scientific frameworks like race realism, your tautological assumptions about taxonomy, and everything else that blinds you to the fallacies and biases you so regularly employ in your arguments. Literally no point in talking to someone so set in their (misguided, error-laiden) ways. Good day to you sir

>> No.18832996 [View]
File: 35 KB, 540x540, 2a5945a1804db09bc5369a0663234b1ddoge-pointing-gun-meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18832988
I am the Anon in question, and I can indeed verify, I am literally Hitler.
For real though, you look at Buddhism from the perspective of 19th century Western philosophy. I don't believe that can capture it.
Also I was pretty proud of the King Crimson reference, so laugh, faggot!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]