/lit/ - Literature

>>1945710
>>1945710
>>1945710

I think Brownbear is making a very valid point, and one that is easily understandable to anyone who has even the slightest understanding of the development of Western thought-- which few here do. Allow me to elucidate:

Humor, psychologically speaking, is nothing more than an emotional ejaculation, a pleasurable release of mental tension that cannot helped but be compared to sexual issue. Those who engage in it constantly are like the chronic masturbators, and their produce can be seen in every post, as though metaphorically crusted with their dried shame.

The irony, of course, is that humor, like religion and masturbation, is a crutch of the low-born. The powerful have no need of it-- except in those instances that it may be employed to control the lower castes. However, unlike religion, which is easy enough to control, and masturbation, which can be controlled by proxy through religion, humor cannot be controlled in any effective amount-- it breeds and grows strong in the very places that power cannot exist, erects itself in inappropriate places, ejaculates itself over the very metaphysical subject upon which its existence depends, and the irony-- the irony previously alluded to-- is that when it does, as when one read posts like this one, one feels exactly like pic related.