/lit/ - Literature

>>15442265
That's a sweet piece of graphic art.

The short ("Metro"), medium ("Sign") and tall ("Keaton") versions of the same font -- I'm not a font expert, but I've never seen anything quite like that before.

As for my reading/academic habits, I would rather be spending my time in the clear, fixed reality of a back lot with Clyde and Buster making Cops and The Goat, than drifting through the unreal haze of the current year.

>>13636118
God explains why there's something rather than nothing.

Nothing doesn't.

God is less retarded than not-God.

>>12676423
"Man, you must be puttin' me on"

Atheist = There is no god.

Agnostic = I'm not sure if there's a god.

>Theist and Atheist are beliefs.

Agnostic is also a belief - a belief that one does not know, or cannot know.

>Gnostic and Agnostic refer to the nature of those beliefs.

Say what?

Anywho, the distinctions you draw seem drawn from the distinctions that have arisen in debate about these questions on the internet over past two decades or so.

Go back to a book written in the 1950s or earlier, and the distinction between "agnostic" and "atheist" is clear-cut.