/lit/ - Literature

>>3586647
>>3586678
I'm enjoying, I'm just curious if there's anywhere art has left to go but backwards. It seems like we've hit a dead end.

>>3537615
I know someone with the Sonic logo on his ass. He was manager there for 10 years, his dad was like state manager or something, ran in the family, made his best friends there, felt very loyal.

Even without the backstory, it's a much more tasteful tattoo than this pleb shit:
>>3537618
>>3537607
>>3537602

Underarmor on the ankle, Nike swoosh on the foot, those I can get behind, at least you can admit and poke fun at the absurdity of branding your body. It's not like picking a corporate logo over शून्यता is any less born out of mass media influence.

>>3425811
Yeah, seeing that kind of stuff is part of what got me disillusioned with it. And also that most things being made was really bad, especially the visual art.
I feel like if I did make an attempt to really be a part, I'd end up just getting annoyed and passive aggressively mocking everyone, though I'm sure there are a lot of good people involved. Anyways, I don't like my writing much and the approach is much too ironic to be considered sincere, too surreal to be auto biographical.

>>3414728
>Not to mention my claim to his bad taste was because of the way he seemed to take in the "geniuses"
aligns with the approach you're accusing me of.*
And I'm sure most of the evidence comes from my interpretation of his taste.