/lit/ - Literature

>>17315784
>further reading
"Go read through all of these books at random because i'm not going to cite more than a few actual studies that directly apply to whatever arguments i'm making"
sorry, but that's playing fast and loose.
>You've managed to be reductive
I'm sorry, i could've sworn you were the one who decided to be reductive in the first place. Why are we holding me to a different standard? Is it because you're making disingenuous arguments and have no intention of entertaining any data we present? That's what it sure looks like.