/lit/ - Literature

Why yes, I do prefer the New Living Translation: Hope for Today edition. How could you tell?

>>13429428
>i have a hard time accepting that a sacred document could be flawed, and many people believe the Bible literally and think it isn't flawed at all by the way
Ah, sure.
Some are like that. But there are some denominations that do not.
>believing in shit just cause it makes you feel good is bluepilled and lame
Sure, that is why some denominations hate that shit as well Televangelism. Given how pic related fucking dropped out of a Bachelor's program and never went to a seminary.
>it's not that i "can't make an argument without using the Bible", it's that the Bible is pretty damn relevant when the thread is about the truth of Christianity lmao
Christianity is not only about the Bible though, there's the general Theology that everyone learns, the History, etc. That is why I am stating the same question since it is ridiculous to only do loaded questions regarding the bible while avoiding many other subjects.
>took you long to finally understand the point i've been making snice my first post lol
Eh, write better then. This is why I also preach the /lit/ wiki Liberal Arts chart from time to time.