[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.19249333 [View]
File: 1.15 MB, 700x813, driving force.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19249333

>>19248500
How much of a cuck do you have to be to back up ebooks

>> No.18981129 [View]
File: 1.15 MB, 700x813, driving force.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18981129

>>18980729
Bro went from bragging about how no one could put the book down to taking it down from everywhere in about a week. kdbooks was too hard on his sweet bussy :(

>> No.18798369 [View]
File: 1.15 MB, 700x813, 1621918553299.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18798347

>> No.18727644 [View]
File: 1.15 MB, 700x813, 1622372853351.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18727644

In your own words, answer the question....what is philosophy?

>> No.18350408 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.15 MB, 700x813, 1605080206498.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18350408

Serious Question:
Sex is such a driving force in most humans, that it's intrinsic in art. Be it romance, or despair, or depravity, most literature at least touches on wanting to play grab-ass with someone.

Can I understand literature if I'm asexual? I have never felt any desire or impulse to bump uglies with anyone, and I've seen the same sentiment echoed by most people that consider themselves asexual or even aromantic: that they thought that "cis" people are being hyperbolic when they talk about sexual/romantic attraction and desire. That it was a little in-joke they just didn't quite get.

So- can asexuals and aromantics fully experience literature, or are they just fucked?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]