/lit/ - Literature

Ignore the above guy.

I'm writing an MC who could reasonably branch out into the majority of fantasy professions or archetypes (Warrior, Priest, Mage, Thief, Druid, etc.) based on their adventuring, BUT it cannot be a human character. With this in mind, what fantasy race or species do you think is the best fit for this premise?

>>23166095
Fuck it, normally I report off topic shit like this but I'll take a crack.

Either break up with her now over that, or get over it and have sex with her. No book will really change your mind if you feel so strongly about this. If you're very focused on the status of virginity and you want someone with whom you can lose your virginity together, then it won't be special if you have sex with your gf now. But if you're desperate to lose your virginity now, then just go for it.

>>21992102
>>21992108
>>21992109
>>21992143
You think I'm joking around? I'm dead serious.
>Christians constantly getting hung up on the concept of heaven/salvation- such as "how can you be happy in heaven if someone else is burning in hell?"
>People have to cope out of the argument by saying "God works in mysterious ways" at most, or some semantic "they send themselves there" argument
>Mentally run this idea through; becomes obvious that if the "soul" is separated from the biological body then all behaviors based in biology (love for family members, tribalism, empathy towards others as routed in mirror neurons, etc.) will fall away or "ascend" into a higher and more spiritual form, thus revealing the truth- ie; you loved your brother for biological reasons but in reality has was a bad person and you no longer have that qualm and will understand the spiritual truth once your bodily-ego is removed from your "soul"

Even gay RETVRN Trad-Larpers on /lit/ have never once posted anything close to this concept, which neatly solves and explains the problem. It seems obvious to me even though I don't believe in spiritualist nonsense. How did Christian theologians miss something so obvious for so long? Am I just smarter then them or something?

The same goes for Marxists who make good points in regards to the nature of capital/profit- constantly expanding and demanding more of itself- but they go completely off the rails looking for unrealistic solutions and impossible, self-defeating societies in regards of deindustrialization. Even pessimists/anti-natalists, who have some strong moral arguments, somehow never can fully get across the truth depth of the indifferent cruelty of the universe in the way I have seen it, making me think they're somehow more sheltered then me, and yet despite that fall into mental weakness of believing in anti-natalism as opposed to the divine and cosmic struggle which seems much more reasonable to me.

I have never considered myself an especially intelligent person but I just continually mop the floor with these ideas and concepts that nobody else seems to explore or put language to despite, to me, seeming obvious and easy answers to their philosophical woes. What's the deal here? Do people just not share ideas of this depth and level of thinking or are all these "thinker" types actually retarded or something? What gives?