/lit/ - Literature

>>14833429
I posted a multitude of images, you are being obtuse. Beyond that I made it clear that I don't think my images are proof of anything, other than to suggest to you that these types of Italians -at least- exist, to sensibilize you to the possibility that your canon of "white" vs "non-white" is pseudo-scientific at best.

Genetic research shows that Italians are their own people, you can map up -any- people to cluster to a segment and call it a "people" and Italians clearly are a people. They clearly resemble Europeans, genetically, but also people from the Balkans and from the whole of the mediterranean. Now another group that, even according to me, is not "white" are the Turks, who equally map unto Balkan and mediterranean genetic clusters.

Turks clearly differ from Italians in many shapes and forms, and so do both from Libyans and so do all of these from Ashkenazi Jews. The resemblences however make a canonical account of "holistically white" non-sensical, for slicing Italian into this cake of whitehood would pressure you to include a whole of shitskin arabs, Jews and Turks into this group. Depending on the case, certain nations from the middle east are now white. The whole of eastern minor Asia, thus, a large segment of Turkey is now white.

You are confused about what the fuck you're talking about because you're some 19 year old brainwashed zoomer who hasn't done any research in his entire life.

>empirically true
It's not empirically true that Google is
>manipulating google results for "italian people" to only show the darkest and swarthiest of Italians, hiding those precious Aryan specimen behind the veils of the Jewish hypertext
You don't even know what empiricism is, subhuman Ameriretard.