[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13327103 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 1200x1788, 67198807_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13327103

I AM SO FUCKING ALIENATED BECAUSE I WATCHED TOO MUCH ANIME AND NOW THAT I'M PAST HIGH SCHOOL AGE I FEEL A DEEP DESIRE TO BE A KID AGAIN I JUST WANT TO GO BACK TO BEING A FUCKING TEENAGER OH MY GOOOOD WHY DO PEOPLE HAVE TO AGE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHAT ARE THE PHILOSOPHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS I NEED SOMEONE TO ARGUE ME OUT OF THIS TERRIBLE FEELING, PRESENT ME WITH A THEORY ABOUT HOW MY FEELINGS ARE CAUSED BY MEDIA-INDUCED DELUSION OR SOMETHING TELL ME ABOUT SOME TIQQUN BAUDRILLARD INVISIBLE COMMITTEE TYPE SHIT PLEASE ANYTHING TO MAKE IT GO AWAY AAA
I JUST WANT TO WATCH ANIME AND JERK OFF BUT I DON'T EVEN GET HORNY ANYMORE BECAUSE I KEEP THINKING ABOUT THE FACT THAT I'M BASICALLY A FULL ASS MAN, AND I WONDER IF IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH HAVING LESS HORMONES AND SHIT LIKE THAT, LIKE ALL MY SEXUAL ANXIETIES ARE GONE AND I MISS THEM I KNOW IT SOUNDS WEIRD BUT I WANT THEM BACK BUT INSTEAD ALL I HAVE IS THIS HORRIBLE "ADULT"-NESS, I FEEL ASEXUAL AND DEEPLY DISTURBED AND IN A SOMEWHAT CATATONIC STATE THAT I CAN'T RECOVER FROM? PLEASE HELP??

>> No.12754123 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 1200x1788, 67198807_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12754123

>>12739320
aquinas blatantly states his own metaphysical intuitions. For most ppl this is an issue because it means relying on an epistemological indubitability that he himself has set up and approaches it systematically, rather than adhering to a heuristic of critical thinking and deductive reasoning. On the one hand this is because empiricism was still far off and nominalism hadnt been formulated yet either. On the other hand theres an underlying proposition in medieval logic that doesnt rlly depend on empirical verification which is this: medieval logic takes a naturalistic approach to the 'other'... whereas modern philosophy subsumes an other e.g in its focus on language... Aquinas was spot on in his cosmology especially when formulating the argument from contingency, which proves god without a doubt, with its only detractors being those who, simply distrust the metaphysical instinct... and so to obvious assertions like how there must be a single god and not two, theyll be like "but how do u know" and the point here of course is that its self evident from the bylaws of existence itself but well analytic thinkers dont really have any concept of cosmology n so continue to say dumb shit like what if the universe existed forever...

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]