/lit/ - Literature

>>21948672
>"The point about quantum mechanics isn't saying that science is the end all of knowledge."
It's a contradictory statement given that "quantum" literally means "quantity", "Discrete". You can't equate it to science or philosophy, it's metaphysical at best. Whatever point you were trying to make is lost in the confusion stemming from this platitude. If you really want me to go into more detail:
>Hasn’t quantum physics proved
No. It hasn't "proved" anything as a theory based upon pure atomistic speculation.

>more than anything that we can’t overcome our instrumentation and that reflections of reason at the limits of thought and experience have equal opportunity to be confirmed or denied?
This fucking triangle did that. No spectrometers or kosher light theory needed to speculate over.

>>21948673
>We aren't talking about an object to be negated
I'm not the scientist here. Who would feel the need to negate the unreal and temporal anyway?

>>18571275
>Meanwhile actually solving mathematical problems has inherently advanced my abilities, particularly to reason, and see poor reasoning.
Math doesn't help you do any of that though.

>>18570013
From nothing comes nothing.