[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16548786 [View]
File: 357 KB, 960x1280, Firenze.Loggia.Perseus02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16548786

>>16548761
Except Perseus didn't RAPE her. Cutting off her head certainly isn't a euphemism for rape in Ancient Greece, a culture that had no problem discussing and even celebrating the topic.

>> No.9634529 [View]
File: 367 KB, 960x1280, Firenze.Loggia.Perseus02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9634529

ITT: Name a book you're currently reading. Tell others how much you like or dislike it.

>> No.9623507 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 367 KB, 960x1280, Firenze.Loggia.Perseus02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9623507

Leave this board and never return if any one of these applies to you:
:>you read any form of genre fiction
>you barely know your classics
>you tend to believe that if you like a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>you think everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>you speak a single language
>you read contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>you read for the plot
>you read for entertainment
>you rarely read nonfiction
>you don't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>you don't have at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>you have little to no understanding of literature outside of your cultural horizon
>you have little to no understanding of literature within your own cultural horizon
>you mostly read contemporary literature
>you believe 'the author is dead'
>you make your literary analysis proceed from ideology
>you think intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>your rarely read poetry
>you think Rhythm and Rhyme is just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>you have a hard time explaining why you like a given work
>you have a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>you tend to refuse to judge works for yourself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>you rarely read for more than one or two hours straight

>> No.9622289 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 367 KB, 960x1280, Firenze.Loggia.Perseus02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9622289

Please leave this board and never return if you agree with any of the following sentences:

>you read any form of genre fiction
>you barely know your classics
>you tend to believe that if you like a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>you think everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>you speak a single language
>you read contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>you read for the plot
>you read for entertainment
>you rarely read nonfiction
>you don't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>you do not at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>you have little to no understanding of literature outside of your cultural horizon
>you have little to no understanding of literature within your own cultural horizon
>you mostly read contemporary literature
>you believe 'the author is dead'
>you make your literary analysis proceed from ideology
>you think intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>your rarely read poetry
>you think Rhythm and Rhyme is just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>you have a hard time explaining why you like a given work
>you have a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>you tend to refuse to judge works for yourself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>you rarely read for more than one or two hours straight

ITT: Post the book you're currently reading. Tell others how much you're enjoying it.

>> No.6310842 [View]
File: 367 KB, 960x1280, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6310842

So Perseus would've kicked Achilles' ass, right?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]