/lit/ - Literature

>>17858672
you're on the nose with the uni thing
women pursue a facade of intellectualism in order to maintain some level of sexual attractiveness

>>17544979
I'll give you an example; I'm an anthropology student, 95% of my class size are women, and this leaves a very small minority of men (most of whom up their agreeableness to kiss the ass of women in the class and their professors). In all likelihood, my major has only about a 2% male demographic. This is not an exaggeration, of every class I have ever taken there have only ever been two or three other guys in class sized ranging from 20 to 50. There is no real other reason beyond the fact that women are agreeable and verbose, and are incredibly good at sucking up to professors as their "in" into academia which is run by more agreeable people. Almost done with my undergrad and it has completely turned me off of going to graduate school, I can't stand the level of uncreative regurgitation and cock-sucking necessary to succeed in such an environment.

>>16525264
No one's noticed yet, but there are 16 names on there. The woman who made the post made her name the largest compared to the philosophers she claims are significant. Thus proving that she values recognition over making a point.
Pic is very much related.

>>16211172
Nothing academic will make it out of the near future. I'm an Anthropology and Linguistics major, my classes consistently have 2-5 men in 80 people lectures. A field's decline is proportional to how many women are in it. The STEM fields won't be safe so long as it is entwined with academia. I implore all of you to start pivoting toward technical work or a niche fields that involves gutting fish, shooting things, or garbage truck man.

>>16205804
She's not entirely wrong, but women only educate themselves because of their vanity. It's amazing she even knows seven authors, truly a specimen worth offing in the event that she breeds more.