/lit/ - Literature

>>19321554
>20 minutes of idpol.webm
no anon. there's a reason why Marxists reject this kind of nonsense for the idealism it is. its purpose is to foster class peace. the fact that the guy in the vid starts seething about blacks receiving welfare says all I need to know. blindness to the nature of exploitation
it's not difficult to understand why this kind of shit has taken hold in the west. we can thank third wave feminism for this. play identity games, win identity prizes
>>19321602
>parliamentary socialists work to import more brown people
radlibs and succdems don't understand how the labour market works, I agree. compare this to how the First International dealt with immigration. Cockshott has one example in this vid around 11 minutes in: https://vid.puffyan.us/watch?v=gwtmfuRzEcA
>parliamentary socialists work to redistribute wealth from white people to brown people
if you're upset about some of the crumbs porky lets you have being given to black people then you need to inform yourself on the nature of exploitation
it is the substitution of class politics for identity politics that is the prime issue that Marxists are having to deal with today

>>18785038
>The state stopped your ability to sue for damages against factories in industrial rev even though they knew pollution was bad
yes, the state serves the interests of the bourgeoisie
>Capitalism would privatise the air
some porkies want to do literally this, and privatize the oceans, and you would complain about it calling it "not real capitalism" if they did

>>18785048
>socialist corporatist
you have to be over 18 to post on this site anon

>>18786377
>What communists want is essentially total, unrestrained theft
no, communists want the end of unrestrainted theft, the end of surplus value extraction from the workers to the bourgeoisie. an end to exploitation

>>18651450
>implying marginalism is falsifiable
nice meme anon
things like LTV are perfectly falsifiable. just remove all labour and see what happens to profits
as I said originally, there's a reason why bourgeois political econ ditched materialism in favor of idealism