[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13900151 [View]
File: 60 KB, 594x405, images (68).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13900151

>>13899793
Indeed. A god that has to sacrifice generations endlessly to keep the flame of my glory burning. Notice that the statue figure is balanced on a child.

I mean yea though. What's the big deal?

>> No.13078318 [View]
File: 60 KB, 594x405, images (68).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13078318

Return to me my sweet divine emanations.

>> No.13077637 [View]
File: 60 KB, 594x405, images (68).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13077637

>>13073898
Decent question.

I'd say monist, eternalist. Everything is as it is and will always be that way. The moment (time) is justwhere the monad (the totality of possibilities) actualizes itself for consciousness. The monad is being, the appearance of change is becoming, which is just a function of how the monad is revealed for human consciousness. Influenced largely by buddha, everything though. Science is the expression of the laws of one possibilities realisation, ours. "Harmonizing with the Tao", "walking with god", "entering the tathagata realm" and so on are just various ways of describing being in tune with the possibility this realisation of the monad consists of. Strife is caused by the discord within the monad that arises from human imagination which has the ability to conceive other possibilities. Strife is caused by the conflict between the imagination of one possibility desiring something else. The buddhists and stoics (cynics are more based though) are the probably the closest to directly articulating this.

Why? Just seems to make sense.


>>13073928
Gross. Who stepped in mundanity? Nah but i get yah. He didn't have to be a charlatan about it though.

>>13073955
Based haven't read Plotinus but seems good.
>"Once you have uttered 'The Good,' add no further thought: by any addition, and in proportion to that addition, you introduce a deficiency." (III.8.11)

Reminds me of old Sid.

>>13074244
Fuck of with your mystical reactionary trad bullshit.

>>13074681
So essentially: drink the cool-aid, we'll tell you whats in it after.

>>13074031
Well put based socratic poster.


>>13076080
Ive said it before. Its easy to be a Bonapartist in retrospect. I bet if he was around today you'd look at him like Putin though.

>>13076100
Found the philistine

>>13077140
Shalom coward

>>13077574
>"Yahwey most perfect description of a god"

Debatable. Pic related.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]