[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.9056154 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, 59cbe4348e8ea90208d6ecaf061cd0f7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9056154

Thoughts on his philosophy?

>> No.8970594 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, ReneD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8970594

>>8970089
No discernible talent.

>> No.8820141 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, descartes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8820141

>>8820086
Clearly an evil demon placed lots of fake evidence to make it look like the holocaust happened.

>> No.8590991 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, dickart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8590991

Voyeuristic Disorder

>> No.8374051 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8374051

what are some words that commonly pop up in analyses of culture/historical context/themes/etc of literature or history that plebs, like myself, probably do not know?
im interested in reading some critiques of various pieces of literature but im amateur and will probably have a hard time reading

ie words like:
>contemporary, marxist, contrarian, neo-nazi, dialectics
or any words you think are useful in reading more critical works

also don't just say 'read it with a dictionary' because while that does help me learn on the go, i do also want to see if there are any unconventional/unpopular words that have a lot of meaning that i can use.

if u don't have anything to post but insults just don't post

>> No.7274648 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, rene.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7274648

I'm looking for this website that is an ebook depository and can't remember it. It pretty much was a one search thing that had almost anything that I looked for. Can't remember anything more than that other than it looked like a university or college online library search tool and that there was a Russian backup version.

>> No.7259162 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7259162

>>7259121
You know what to do...

>> No.7182707 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7182707

So if you were given a choice to explain why Plato, Socrates, or Descartes was wrong in any of their arguments, who would you choose? What would you argue about, anon? For me, I would choose Descartes due to how inconsistent the Cartesian Circle is with proving the existence of god.

>> No.7127927 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7127927

>"I think, therefore I am."

Discuss.

>> No.7024414 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7024414

I am Spongebob.

>> No.6941161 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, MTE1ODA0OTcxMjY3MzYwMjY5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6941161

>>6941150

>> No.6712584 [View]
File: 135 KB, 1200x1200, give her the d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6712584

What's the proper hermeneutic approach to interpreting a divinely inspired text, like the Bible or the Vedas or the Quran?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]