/lit/ - Literature

>>10252461
OP = slave morality

Making master morality is as something "evil" is a sure sign of slave morality

>>9530828
>>9530883
>He is saying that hallucination and reality cannot be distinguished by the senses

no he's not saying that, he's comparing master/slave morality to a healthy and a sick eyesight.

The healthy eyes want to see more and see things as beautiful and sharp, the sick eyes see things as blurry and stimuli are painful

A bad eyesight is not "untrue" just like it is not "true" either

>one cannot refute christianity: It is impossible to refute a diseased eyesight

>>7185150
Nobody mentioned anything about moral realism except you for... Well I don't know why..

Nietzsche talks about morality as a biological mechanism. And that was my point too. Are you taking once again, 5 words of what I said and ignoring the whole, to come up with your own interpretation of what I said?

>>7185161
It's not an ambiguous passage.... see >>7184920

He has a ton of those, I read similar things from the gay science, the case of wagner, genealogy, ecce homo.

>>6841328
>IMAGINE HOW GREAT THINGS WOULD BE IF THERE WERE NO MORALS HOLDING BACK SUPERIOR INTELLECTS

Umm no

>These antithetical forms in the optics of value, are both necessary

It's just that one pull down, the other pull up, nietzsche prefer to pull ppl up than down.

>>6780043
I think he's suggesting that kaufmann is a dumbass

>nietzsche does not favor master morality
>ecce homo is ironic
>nietzsche does not actually mean this

>>6671608
...............

>>6658655
Thats stupid and wrong on so many level.

>>6627141
>slave morality impoverish, bleaches, mars the value of things; it suppress the world. "world" is a christian term of abuse.

>>6627086
>>6627107
>>6627122

Trying to impoverish and suppress the value of gamergate uh

>>6561896
He explain that but in other books.

They are smarter but not in a way that advance life forward, not in a healthy way. Only smarter in revenge. So they end up bringing only destruction behind their beautiful morals and ideal.

>>6324776
Nietzsche wrote that his books are a great example of slave morality.

>>6315676
Nietzsche use warrior/priest as examples of master/slave morality not slaves...

>>6266158
It's not debatable, kauffman is a dumbass.

>These antithetical forms in the optics of values, are both necessary: they are different points of view which cannot be circumvented either with arguments or counter-arguments. One cannot refute Christianity: it is impossible to refute a diseased eyesight. That people should have combated pessimism as if it had been a philosophy, was the very acme of learned stupidity. The concepts “true” and “untrue” do not seem to me to have any sense in optics.