/lit/ - Literature

Are nationalism and autochthonism welcome too?

The classic that will scare the fuck out of you is Quigley although he is ambivalent or even positive about it. Anglo-American Establishment and Tragedy & Hope.

If you want to understand it at its financial roots, because it is essentially economic colonialism, or at least uses the deracinating effects of technocratic capitalist rationalisation to invade and disorient countries so they lose their specificity and integrity, then Lenin's Imperialism (his idea of finance imperialism) is good. So is Dobrogeanu-Gherea's neo-serfdom concept. History of Central Banking by Goodson is also good. I recommend you read these four articles if you are interested in these topics:
https://counter-currents.com/tag/breaking-the-bondage-of-interest/

Samuel Francis in Leviathan and Its Enemies describes the rise of "rootless" globalist technocrats and the totalitarian security apparatus and lumpenproletarianisation they inevitably cause and rule over. He is drawing from James Burnham, a Marxist theorist of the "managerial class." Samuel Huntingdon also does interesting work on related topics, like his "Davos man" (again, globalist technocrats).

Paul Piccone and other "conservative Marxists" are also good critics of the phony utopanism of late liberalism, which has been weaponised and turned into a sovereignty-seeking delayed deracination missile by "neo-liberal" economics.
https://c2cjournal.ca/2009/06/where-marx-and-conservatives-meet-the-writings-of-paul-piccone/

The critique here is that late liberalism destroys genuine alterity by only integrating it in a superficial way, essentially by commodifying it and reproducing it as astroturf. It is not truly "liberal," it is "liberal as long as you stay within the bounds of status quo normalcy of late liberal states," which are really just vehicles for neo-liberal economics, which is a commodified/niced up version of finance capitalism. The capitalist machine specialises in taking existing things outside itself, ripping them apart and destroying their essence, and then converting their dead husks into narcotics and selling them back to the people who created them. Globalism is just the extension of this process to a "global market," where not even individual nations, creeds, and ways of life are fundamentally distinct from eachother anymore. No matter what kind of funny hat you wear or what you call your god, you all fundamentally exist within and according to the presuppositions of late liberalism. So you can be a gay Islamic Mexican whose whole identity is based around surgically shapeshifting into a tiger, as long as this never tries to actually criticise or limit the runaway power of finance.

Slobodian's recent book looks interesting.

>>15021573
Is three generations “deep roots” to you?
No. That’s not deep roots. They have homelands that need tending to. It’s their duty to return and make it a better place to live. That might sound strange to you.

>>15021574
People like you are throwing this world into chaos.