/lit/ - Literature

>>13315886
I give the meteor and the nukes about even odds. Upside is that a stray meteor won't involve a massive counter attack, though I suppose either would shake things up.

In terms as to how tech solves climate change, actually was thinking of nuclear reactors specifically, though I don't really advocate it myself. But solar, fusion, etc. etc. Up until the last forty years or so, when somehow pollution became a good thing (in the US, at least), it's all only been getting cleaner and more efficient, and even that new trend has only slowed things up a bit, in addition to not exactly being irreversible.

The real problems are cultural, not technological. It's how technology is used, not that it simply exists. Sure, there's temptations involved, but giving up isn't a real viable option, especially with so many others to choose from.