/lit/ - Literature

>>14291087
>>There's a reason I...blahblah Tone argument
Nice tone argument. Bonus points for
>I didn't listen to any of the work but disagree
You'd make a great game critic

>Sure it could be "deep", but more likely you've just taken an off handed line by a pseud and tried to make it into something it isn't
Death of the author. You don't have to dig deeper or believe authors actually put something deeper into your music if you're lazy, think they're lazy, or just don't want to expand your taste and learn. This is the literary equivalent of ordering off the kid's menu, but more power to you, anon.

I bet you were the kid who complained, when their teacher asked you to write an essay about themes, that the teacher was "just making stuff up"

>>This shit is fine in music but there's nothing lit about it
>He knows nothing about the fundamental historical interconnectedness of song and literature as co-developing drivers of one and the other, particularly in the time of oral history or in the self-definition of /lit/ movements
oh the times they are a-changin'

>>I was using "we" as in 4chan
>I was pretending to be retarded!
cope

>>14291136
The whole is more than the sum of it's parts, as always, and you can do anything shitty. I'm mostly calling them out as someone whom I think does it well.