[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.8360488 [View]
File: 63 KB, 452x378, 2657954377_2b49e4a799.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8360488

Any honest observation of female behavior is going to irritate their sensitive little vaginas and get labeled "sexist".

Women tend to have an utterly phony self-image. Salome lops off John the Baptist's head than probably giggles like a little bitch later. Gertrude sleeps on incestuous sheets and forgets her dead husband after less than two months. Helen of Troy drags an entire civilization to war over her infidelity and wantonnes. The overriding message being: Women are destructive and evil sinners but somehow they remain completely shameless and oblivious.

Note how whimsical and phony the female self-image is in women-oriented and authored fiction. Garbage like Sex and the City or Broad City. They're horribly flawed in the perception of their actions and consequences, like the closet scene in Hamlet, whenever life holds up a mirror and thrusts this truth in their face they cry out abuse and cover their ears.

>> No.8318897 [View]
File: 63 KB, 452x378, 2657954377_2b49e4a799.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8318897

Black people are inherently incompatible with high art of which literature is the highest. Their attempts at evoking tragic pity or terror comes only from their drawn out personal accounts of poverty or slavery or racism which is at this point a cliché.

Women can have workmanlike technical skill in the visual arts and if there's a perfect storm something like Woolf can occur in literature but her thesis in Shakespeare's Sister: "what if there was a female Shakespeare and we just let that talent go to waste because omg sexism?" is crap since Woolf herself is second rate compared to the important figures in modernist literature (Joyce, Eliot) and in the past 100 or so years Western Civilization been stuck in this fucked up social experiment we've probably just ended up stifling male would-be Shakespeares.

There's zero basis to any "gays are inferior" assertions. People hate homosexuality because of religious dogma, the vulgar nature of the modern LGBT movement and its gaudy pride parades or just a rude Philistine disdain for male sensitivity. It's entirely possible for homosexuals to fit perfectly fine into society; anyone who knows anything about art history or just history in general knows how prevalent homosexuality was in Athens, the cradle of Western Civilization and its basis for its philosophy and its aesthetic principles for art, both literary and visual. Homoerotic male beauty, which in its depictions up until modern times was easier to discern in an aesthetic way than female beauty in male beauty is apprehends the viewer by its arresting and awe-inspiring qualities as opposed to kinetic and lusting ones, was a frequent subject for the great Italian masters and many of the great Romantic poets of the 19th century.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]