/lit/ - Literature

>>9028412
((10% vs. 90%) Would we assume those 10% are more correct with their theory, as we assume the small minority of elite; as opposed to masses (of pop culture, ''average' 'awareness''); has the higher more ideal, divine, valuable tastes ((The noble blooded aristocratic spirited is of a different species))? Why couldn't the 90% be convinced (if the 10% were/are right enough (what does right mean, how is it proven?) to prove to themselves) if; what would it mean for 10% view of art to be better? Closer to truth/Truth, more accurate?

What can better ever mean; most pleasurable (does the value of art, at least one dimension have to do with pleasure; would objective value, critique, understanding of art and its potential value, not have anything to do with pleasure, is that possible/)? and in the head, are their different size penises which react (naturally (?)) to different forms and elements of art; and the 10% had the largest dick heads, with the most nerve endings per node; and they know that these head peens, their big one A, others have A, B, C, D, E, too just as '10%' does, but they are varying sizes for others, with varying quantity and quality of nerves, and so 10% with big A, (or do they have the biggest A through Z? or both and more circumstances can/should always be considered) have been taken most care of and have most use and that is why their understanding of "The True Real World" is more accurate; they have all the dick brains as everyone: its just theirs have the most use, the most experience, the most feedback, intra-outra-ultra relation, most length and girth, most nerves and connections, most sensoryations of furtherest regions of information time and space.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WQk3QVCUoE

What is the best edition of "Ulysses"?

What are the best editions of The Iliad and Odyssey?

Who are the best translators for Plato? I'm reading the Hackett edition now, and it's fine to read from for comprehension (I've only read Grubes translations so far) but I've heard there are translations that better show Plato's poetic skill. Grube's translations are fine for a first read I believe, but I'd like something with better writing for the next.

Can the phenomenonal world ever be accurately described by language?

Who /symbolism/ here?