/lit/ - Literature

ANYONE HAVE ANY MORE CONCEPTS OR IDEAS TO POST?

NEVER CHANGE /LIT/

>>4487127
I could pick this whole post apart but that is more then you deserve, I mean, holy shit. Do you try to be this retarded or does it just come natural?

Maybe the whole notion of a patriarchy, defined as two monolithic groups of male "oppressors" and female "oppressed" is a myth, or better still, a political concept of marxist intellectuals who wanted to use females as a proletariat in the communist revolution.

The real world was more complicated. Some females had power, some men were discriminated, if you were a peasant chances are your life would be shitty as a man or as a female. If you were a aristocrat you could receive education even as a female.

Any erudite cinephile knows the essential /tv/ lists/charts are complete garbage. I find it hard some people actually blindly follow these awful and uneducated recommendations.

Is it the same for the other boards? If I wanted to learn more about basic essentials for other interests, should I avoid them like the plague? I tried reading /fit/'s sticky to get into fitness and got great results by following their basic advices, so even though I'm not a fan of the locker atmosphere they have going on over there, their elite knows what they're talking about, the board is actually knowledgeable and helpful. But arts require more than basic knowledge, they're a matter of taste and education. So if I'm not very well versed in jazz or philosophy for example, are /mu/ and /lit/ full of shit as well or are they actually truthworthy unlike the shithole that is /tv/?