/lit/ - Literature

>>13673562
>>13673948
Jesus christ why does so much of your self-worth as an individual appears to be wrapped around a fucking trainee position on Aldi's of all places what the actual fuck am i reading. I cant reach another conclusion, otherwise you wouldn't be equating an attack on the job itself as character assassination as you are obviously doing, just how dull and insipid can you get?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9_1ZrskfWo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6Xo6W1BZ2M

Is there any kind of media or sociological theory to account for the utterly bizarre lengths that subcultures will take their own aesthetics? Especially on the Internet.

I look at stuff like this and it might as well be made in a different galaxy for all I understand about its aesthetics.

>>4945672
>I have no doubt that you are either a hipster faggot or a troll

You must peruse that "entire spectrum of media" pretty fast, because you concluded someone was a "hipster faggot" based off of one reply they gave you in which they.

1. Merely doubted your opinion.

2. Used less than six words

3. Did not call you names, or insult you

4. Did not reveal any of their cultural, political, or religious leanings.

Now, let's look at this again:

>I have no doubt that you are either a hipster faggot or a troll

Something tells me that, if you concluded this about someone based on less than six words, that you might (not 100% certain here) just be going around the "entire spectrum of media" concluding this about many other people, with limited data.

Now, what sort of credit does this lend to your notion that you see "hipster faggots" everywhere? Are you sure you don't just want to see them everywhere you meet even the mildest opposition? And what exactly about being a "hipster faggot" removes someone's credulity? Elaborate, if you have the time and patience.