/lit/ - Literature

>>4692890
⇒doesn't know Hitchens' razor
⇒calls others uneducated

lol @ the irony

>>4526090
It helps him being enlightened by his own intelligence.

>>4526093
>not what I was doing
Yes, it is. You moved the goalposts from "what does it biologically mean to be a human" to "what is subjective experience".

>no it is not. that principle only means that you can't use things that aren't empirically proven as a hard fact
Hitchens' razor is appliction of modus tollens. If something exists, it has to have evidence. Therefore if it cannot have evidence, it doesn't exist. Do you even propositional logic?

Apply Hitchens' razor.

>implying consciousness exists
Where is your evidence?

From a scientific point of view there is no such thing as "consciousness". Something which has no objectively measurable effects can be dismissed by applying Hitchens' razor.

>>3998500
Qualia cannot be observed, therefore they don't exist. It's like talking about non-interacting spirits. Useless and anti-scientific.

Where is your evidence for that magical soul / consciousness? If something exists, it must have physically testable evidence. Non-interacting demons can be dismissed.

>>3483517
It's called burden on proof, Christfag.