/lit/ - Literature

>>21716670
I would start with traditional astrology, with The Horary Textbook by John Frawley (get the pdf online ofc). Definite rules, no or very little "intuition" involved, you will see clearly whether it works or not. Astrology has been pretty well preserved, beyond that it is a mess of misinformation and speculation. We really need a great reconstruction of Western Esotericism but the mystic-scientist is a dying breed.

>>21457217
Hardly one a skeptic would accept. I couldn't prove they have a mind any more that I could prove mine or that you could prove yours. The ejecta and ion channel things, to be fair, is falsifiable, but they were with the general explanation, and I'm not equipped to argue for those either. I was given a guideline of what I should study to understand the finer details. I may write a book in the future.