/lit/ - Literature

What is /pol/'s - err, I mean /lit/'s opinion regarding Dr. Norman Finkelsfein's book? Is it based and truthpilled, or is it glowing bait?

>>22998682
i meant its history.
>>22998688
yeah i completely agree tbdesu. a better argument for nationalists would be how it's used as an ideological weapon, something a jew wrote about in 2000. plus retardely sperging out over it only helps the regime by giving them an idol to search and destroy. this was known once a upon a time but then charlottesville happened, 85 iq hispanics joined the party, and now it's considered "opticscucking".

>>22988842
maybe start reading holocaust critical literature that isn't written by a patent grifter then.

Have some of the points he raised in this work lost relevance or do they still apply? I'm thinking of reading it, but if there's more pertinent works for the digital age then feel free to discuss them here too.

Also, what are some critiques of this book that aren't just ad homming and kvetching?

Thoughts?