/lit/ - Literature

>>10528529
>Foundherentism is an invalid epistemology.
Making up words will not help you get out of the hole you dug for yourself

>Axioms do need justification.
Yeah, that they are axioms and nothing else. If they are not, you can break them apart into axioms.
Seriously, why dont you make a video where you praise Tolstoi or Stone-cold Jane Austin instead of making a fool out of yourself by pretending to be educated.

>>10528528
>Go ahead and justify Occam's Razor.
You did not just imply that Occams razor is an axiom, did you???
This is getting better and better.
I feel like a reaper in a field of wheat with all you brainlets.