[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13394002 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x395, war.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13394002

Can our liberal migrants defend their position?
https://youtu.be/UB8V3irkNQA
What books or essays defend the Western position going forward? Is it even still existent? And how can liberalism reconcile the current breakdown of law, culture, identity, and order in the West?
Anyone who agrees with Putin can also share their thoughts, books, art, etc. Hopefully this is on-topic, as it is an important consideration in philosophy and should have an important place within literature.

>> No.13316429 [View]
File: 58 KB, 600x395, war.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13316429

>>13316364
This is backwards. You are rewriting history and ideas based on effects, which is itself a liberal conception.
The theory of contracts arises before the micromanagement based upon contracts. So indeed there is an arc of history, whether you see it or not is irrelevant to its existence.

Pic related quote isn't that far off from Schmitt. And my first thought is that at one point even liberalism had a deeper feeling for war, even a theological component, than the rudimentary political reactionism of the fascists, who were supposedly informed by Schmitt. If this is the case - both a fundamental agreement in law and technology as well as a degenerative determinism - then there must be something else at play besides liberalism.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]