/lit/ - Literature

>>21445980

>>21200332
>Instead of offering details put forward by the book you seethed about the general character of Stalin's leadership during the war. That hints you're someone who likes to have their takes fed to them while under the delusion that, because theyre contrarian, you've put in more work than you have and are above traditiontraditional criticism.
What is this schizo armchair drivel? Nigger nobody is seething here but you. I don't give a shit about what your "take" on Stalin is, you responded to me. The OP is literally asking for unorthodox views on the era. If you have a problem with the book then address the book. Go back to /pol/ if you want to spend an entire thread arguing like a retard over who has the best "take". What kind of drooling retard comes into the thread specifically requesting books with contrarian viewpoints and then gets mad that the thread is full of books with contrarian viewpoints?

>>20575991
>i never claimed the ruling class act in unison either
>proceeds to explain how he thinks the ruling class is implementing some long-term plan