/lit/ - Literature

>>4593617

Only if you believe in the Holocaust, really.

The Unbearable Lightness of Being and 100 Years of Solitude, just to say you've read them and to be able to discuss them. /lit/ bitches love them. They rub them up against their washed cunts.

Also read Crime and Punishment, and Brothers Karamazov just so you can say you've done so. These will give you that intellectual gravitas that makes you seem more mature. Protip: From now until they get their Masters', girls get moist over two types of men: athletes and older guys. It's why all the freshmen girls you'll be interested in go out with seniors. If you can't be older you can talk older.

For the perverse sexies which they also love, read Lolita and the Story of O. Also read The Story of the Eye but don't mention it unless you want to come off as extra edgy which impresses the hell out of freshmen and sophomores. Do not read DeSade, or at least don't admit to it. Girls want their sexual transgressions with no intellectualism attached. . Throw in Sexus and you're well rounded in the bodice ripping department.

You might also read Tropic of Cancer. A certain class of intellectual edgy girl is enraptured with Miller's rebel-without-a-clue-in-Paris shtick. For pointers on correct attitudes around women, read some Bukowski short stories and Sartre's The Stranger. Do not read Nausea.

If you like science fiction or cerebral postmodern headfuckery like Borges, don't try to discuss it with women. DeLilo is safe ground for the postmoderns, but in general I'd stay away from postmodernism altogether. Women may or may not want the pretense of that caché (which is in itself pretense), but they don't actually -like- postmodernism.

Never read any Sommerset Maughm. It's bad for both your game and your mental health. Avoid Steinbeck for the same reasons.

Dumb girls like Winnie the Pooh so brush up on a couple childhood classics. Not even joking.

>>3057567

>>2438277
I wanted to be a writer when I was six and never stopped.

>>2403346

>>2001336
>Sick people
>fuck-ups

>>1826285

Well in that case, like anon said before: Catcher In The Rye. The Pop Art Version of it is "Less Than Zero" from Bret Easton Ellis.

Also (psychological thriller) Fight Club from Chuck Palahniuk is a good decision. Its quite different from the film, but in my opinion way better.

I hope is helps

Walden. Read it.

LOL
>mfw that guy didnt read the whole book or just took that outa context

Good morning and bump.

Does /lit/ approve of or suggest anything by Anthony Burgess? I've already read A Clockwork Orange.

>>1023283
>intelligent women
>not exist

my face