/lit/ - Literature

>>4906099


abstraction is necessary and inevitable when discussing things in increasingly transcendent contexts, think of it as the linguistic form of probabilities; better in such cases to give someone food for thought then something definite and definitely wrong.

>>4813330


very important semantics.

what if i told you that atomism and universalism are practically the same? that both are infact, throughout history, expressions of nominalism, the ultimate intellectual sin. and if taken seriously, would constitute an abrogation of thought whatsoever?

what do you need to hear to understand that you can support group effort where 'group' is not interchangeable with 'everything'?

>tfw you recline in the face of the absent god