[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16409527 [View]
File: 937 KB, 2436x3248, 1490463524045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16409527

>>16409337
meditation, a millenial discipline, exist because the problems of this techonological era?. the "unwanted" voices are as old as human thought. the technological era it has nothing to do with it.
people are subtituting "higher plane" with being in peace, silence the bad voices, silence the ego or whatever stupid notion like that. you cant quit the esoteric and religious tone of meditation just because you use it to feeling better with it. this is like praying to a crux with jesus because it makes you feel beter how he is god and he saves us all, but at the same time you are praying only because the peace inside it gives you. almost all western meditation trend is larping being a enlightened buddhist. you have to accept uncritically the buddhist premises (silence the unwanted voices is good because the real you is not the unwanted voices.) its a fucking cult for a reason you fuckers.

>> No.11800958 [View]
File: 937 KB, 2436x3248, 1490463524045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11800958

>>11800570
is just a random and possibly a passing obsession with identity. (we will have news obsession about what is the really important and the key to all gates of the autoidentity)
basically they throw up hypersubjective arguments to something so silly and tiny (in terms of identity) like the gender or sex. they want to say this identificacion with "gender" is something important and big when is only important to people who have a problem with this identification in first place. what i want to say is that his arguments inherently accept the identification of somebody in his own subjective perspective (i am a hawk because i feel like a hawk) but they dont have the balls to adscribe to this kind of thinking because is all a political game in the end. they dont have ideas, they dont have too much in terms of pure ideas. (the notion that gender identity is identity in itself is so biased and obssesive and auto recurrent that is impossible to talk about it without somebody yelling you about the troubles of trans people ) they inherently selfcensorship his own ideas. they want a totally subjective identity but only in the gender and the "serious" area of gender identity. is something biased in itself.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]