/lit/ - Literature

Seriously, how Kant, absolute peak philosopher, marked off the limit of reason with a beautiful, perfectly ordered philophical sytem with each of his terms rigorously defined, each of his argument perfectly and clearly layed out, did spawn such a fucking obscurantist and failure of philosopher that is Hegel?
I felt a regression when reading him after Kant, I felt like philosophy want to shit because everything that had to be said was said. There wasn't any room for anything new, so in order to say something "new" you had to hide yourself behind a veil of mist trying to fool people. Not defining any term you're using because the book is targeted at "specialist "obviously, also he explicitly argues that his sytem can't be summed up. If you can't sum up his philophical system, how are you even able to think about it, or even able to talk about it? You can't think all his system at once, if you want to discuss with someone about the phenomenoly, you have to take small pieces of it in order to convey your thoughts. But Hegel and his retarded followers forbid that, you can't talk about it, you can't think about it. It has to be the entire thing, the book itself.
The purpose of writing a book is to convey your thoughts, you have a duty to be comprehensible, why? Because if you don't want to be clear, that means that you don't want to properly convey your thoughts! And that is contradictory to the purpose of writing a book!
That's right, fuck Hegel.

Which one do you prefer ?