/lit/ - Literature

>>16098881
>Can we discuss this man and his philosophy?
What would an actual philosophical enquiry into "Ted Kaczynski" look like?
>Like a seminar reading list I mean.
I would even say shit like watching "Arlington Road" would be necessary to understand the enviroment of domestic terrorism in America, to get the emotional punch to the factual readings of OKC and all.

>>12447934
>if it works, it works!

am*ricans truly are pathetic, a country with a population of your size and the best you can manage is a couple of bearded weirdos, some beans-obsessed nature faggot and Judith Butler. Am*rican inferiority is reflected in your seemingly limitless capacity for latching on to philosophical trends. First you tried to copy European Romanticism and German Idealism. Then you tried to rebrand British autism as "Anglo-American" analytic philosophy. Then you opened up your figurative assholes and literal bathhouses for Michel Foucault, le differance man and all manner of French "dude metanarrative lmao" pomos.

Am*ricans have contributed fewer engaging thinkers to the world of letters than even provinicial European countries. I am not sure what is more pathetic, the quotidian ignorance of your general population or the desperate posturing of your so-called "intellectuals".