/lit/ - Literature

>>20299933
are you a chinaman?

>>16850694
A pathetic excuse
>Philosophical discussion can go on either /lit/ or /his/, but those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.
I know you haven't read any books on the subject so you can't refer to one.
Take it to >>>/his/ or >>>/pol/ , bottom feeding trash

>I RUSE GRAMMARY

>>16238625
It's debatable whether the Legalists actually left after the fall of Qin Shi Huang or whether they merged with the Confucians when the Han dynasty sprang up. Debatably their philsophy of rule, stripped of some of its bite, is more prevalent today than Confucianism is.
>Speaking of which what's a good intro on Chinese philosophy that doesn't suppose they're separate from philosophy altogether? Like uses western philosophical terms
I'm not familiar with any book that does that but there has been a lot of comparison between Confucian ethics and virtue ethics so you could probably find some stuff there. Maybe David Wong has written something about it too.
>Moral realism is better than relativism.
Does it matter which is better or which is correct?