/lit/ - Literature

>>6991367
What did you read, friend? I'm just coming off it and l don't like that one bit.

>>6992376
I think this might be bait, but whatever, here's your reply.

Whatever Alexander and Caesar may or may not have done was in line with contemporaneous beliefs, morals, and society.

The only people who truly believe Napoleon was a tyrant are ignorant clowns who buy into British propaganda. Bet you think he's a literal cuckold manlet too. Yeah, it was the British governmwnt that inventes that kins of shitposting.

Napoleon was the best ruler France had aince the Thirty Years' War, and he rightfully takes up his position as one of France's greats. He helped end the Terror, orchestrated the overthrow of the coerupt Directory, and finally disbanded the redundant Consulate full of sycophants.

Napoleon is the one who brought about the golden age in France.

Also, l have no idea why l just typed this out, consdering yours was probably a troll post.

>>6992399
>If you've read enough history, you should come to realise that we are living in one of the most tumultuous periods for over a millenia.

How so?

>>6881401
You won't damage it, it's really well made.

In addition to Napoleon, the book also touches on other rulers such as George III, Emperor Francis, Tsar Alexander. It doesn't go much beyond that, though. It's a biography forst and foremost, so Napoleon takes center stage.