[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21965776 [View]
File: 43 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21965776

If you haven’t read this you should. If you have, you admit you can’t deny this. It destroys all religions and puts your life in your own hand

>> No.20180280 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20180280

Cicero debunked all metaphysical ""knowledge"" in this text

>> No.19991870 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19991870

Start with the Sceptics

>> No.19755747 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19755747

Debunked by the sceptics

>> No.19528931 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19528931

take the sceptic pill anons..

>> No.19476958 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19476958

>On this question, the pronouncements of highly learned men are so varied and so much at odds with each other that inevitably they strongly suggest that the explanation is human ignorance, and that the Academics have been wise to withhold assent on matters of such uncertainty; for what can be more degrading than rash judgement, and what can be so rash and unworthy of the serious and sustained attention of a philosopher, as either to hold a false opinion or to defend without hesitation propositions inadequately examined and grasped?
—Cicero, The Nature of the Gods, 1.1

>> No.19347568 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, on the nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19347568

>be theist
>read this
>realise I was completely wrong about everything

>> No.18445711 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18445711

I prefer philosophical scepticism to "atheism"

>On this question, the pronouncements of highly learned men are so varied and so much at odds with each other that inevitably they strongly suggest that the explanation is human ignorance, and that the Academics have been wise to withhold assent on matters of such uncertainty; for what can be more degrading than rash judgement, and what can be so rash and unworthy of the serious and sustained attention of a philosopher, as either to hold a false opinion or to defend without hesitation propositions inadequately examined and grasped?
—Cicero, The Nature of the Gods

>> No.18363940 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18363940

Has there ever been a book that has done a better job of exposing theists as the brainlets that they are?

>> No.18022589 [View]
File: 44 KB, 313x475, nature of the gods.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18022589

>There are very few handsome people. During my time in Athens, it was hard to find a single handsome lad in every platoon of national servicemen. I know why you're grinning, but my observation is true. A further point: those of us who take our cue from the philosophers of old, and enjoy the company of young men, often find even their physical defects attractive. For Alcaeus, the mole upon a young lad's wrist appeals; though a mole is a physical blemish, the poet considers it a beauty spot.
What did Cicero (in the speaker of Cotta) mean by this?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]